银行 社区服务 每日签到 会员排行 网站地图
  • 1780阅读
  • 5回复

中国为什么现在才开始制造航母

楼层直达
级别: 少校
[棋中红钻5级]发帖数量≥2000篇 [棋中黄钻5级]金币数量≥10000枚 [棋中蓝钻3级]乐币数量≥100枚 [棋中粉钻3级]贡献值数量≥10点 [未点亮棋中彩钻]精华帖数量<1篇
发帖
2355
金币
18985
威望
0
贡献值
11
乐币
350
主题
231

武器的装备对于一个国家来说,是非常重要的,特别是航空母舰,因为航母在第二次世界大战中的出色表现,被世界的上面的多个国家认同,二次世界大战结束以后,世界上面的多个国家开始建设自己的航空母舰,但是,中国在航空母舰上面建设比较的晚,知道今年才有辽宁号的试水,那么中国为什么现在才开始制造航母,难道中国武器比别的国家落后吗?

我们知道我们的基本国策就是经济建设为中心,建造航空母舰需要非常多的花费,甚至比购买一搜航空母舰需要的花费都要多,后期的维护也需要非常的多的费用,对于我国的经济来说,制造航母只能算是一件奢侈品,而且,二次世界大战以后,当时的美苏持续冷战,这也给中国一个喘息的机会来发展经济,所以在当时没有制造航母是有原因的。其次就是武器方面的原因,航母不仅仅需要一个船体,更重要的是上面的军舰飞机的配备,在当时,我们国家还没有自己的水上舰艇以及航空母舰所需要的飞机,所以说,即便是制造出的航空母舰对于我们国家也是没有多大的用途的。
现在我们国家经济形式一好转,就开始发展自己的航空母舰,现在,随着辽宁号的成功试水,我们的军事方面的力量进一步的加强,很多相关方面的专家认为中国的空军实力正在一步步的向美国高度靠近,随着我们自己军事力量的进一步的加强,就不会再有国家来挑衅中国了。

级别: 四级士官
[棋中红钻2级]发帖数量≥100篇 [棋中黄钻1级]金币数量≥100枚 [未点亮棋中蓝钻]乐币数量<10枚 [未点亮棋中粉钻]贡献值数量<1点 [未点亮棋中彩钻]精华帖数量<1篇
发帖
169
金币
459
威望
0
贡献值
0
乐币
2
主题
1
只看该作者 一楼  发表于: 2013-04-06
建造航母能要多少钱?1000亿?在中国还算钱吗现在?主要是以前的国策:韬光养晦
级别: 少校
[棋中红钻5级]发帖数量≥2000篇 [棋中黄钻3级]金币数量≥2000枚 [棋中蓝钻3级]乐币数量≥100枚 [棋中粉钻3级]贡献值数量≥10点 [未点亮棋中彩钻]精华帖数量<1篇
发帖
2569
金币
3442
威望
2
贡献值
10
乐币
427
主题
119

只看该作者 二楼  发表于: 2013-04-07
回 1楼(棋中桌球) 的帖子
非常支持你的观点  中国现在就要 韬光养晦
级别: 列兵
[未点亮棋中红钻]发帖数量<10篇 [未点亮棋中黄钻]金币数量<100枚 [未点亮棋中蓝钻]乐币数量<10枚 [未点亮棋中粉钻]贡献值数量<1点 [未点亮棋中彩钻]精华帖数量<1篇
发帖
3
金币
38
威望
0
贡献值
0
乐币
0
主题
0
只看该作者 三楼  发表于: 2013-04-07

人工智能设计必读


[1 paradox]Why 0.999... is not equal to 1?


Written in 2012


The current mathematic theory tells us, 1>0.9, 1>0.99, 1>0.999, ..., but at last it says 1=0.999..., a negation of itself (Proof 0.999... =1: 1/9=0.111..., 1/9x9=1, 0.111...x9=0.999..., so 1=0.999...). So it is totally a paradox, name it as 【1 paradox】. You see this is a mathematic problem at first, actually it is a philosophic problem. Then we can resolve it. Because math is a incomplete theory, only philosophy could be a complete one. The answer is that 0.999... is not equal to 1. Because of these reasons:


1. The infinite world and finite world.


We live in one world but made up of two parts: the infinite part and the finite part. But we develop our mathematic system based on the finite part, because we never entered into the infinite part. Your attention, God is in it.


0.999... is a number in the infinite world, but 1 is a number in the finite world. For example, 1 represents an apple. But then 0.999...? We don't know. That is to say, we can't use a number in the infinite world to plus a number in the finite world. For example, an apple plus an apple, we say it is 1+1=2, we get two apples, but if it is an apple plus a banana, we only can say we get two fruits. The key problem is we don't know what is 0.999..., we can get nothing. So we can't  say 9+0.999...=9.999... or 10, etc.


We can use "infinite world" and "finite world" to resolve some of zeno's paradox, too.


2. lim0.999...=1, not 0.999...=1.


3.The indeterminate principle.


Because of the indeterminate principle, 1/9 is not equal to 0.111....


For example, cut an apple into nine equal parts, then every part of it is 1/9. But if you use different measure tools to measure the volume of every part, it is indeterminate. That is to say, you may find the volume could not exactly be 0.111..., but it would be 0.123, 0.1142, or 0.11425, etc.


Now we end a biggest mathematical crisis. But most important is this standpoint tells us, our world is only a sample from a sample space. When you realized this, and that the current probability theory is wrong, when you find the Meta-sample-space, you would be able to create a real AI-system. It will indicate that there must be one God-system in the system, which is the controller. Look our world, there must be one God, as for us, only some robots. Maybe we are in a God's game, WHO KNOWS?


相关阅读
★概率论:完全可能性的理论与现实图景
★悖论问题的统一解
★从延安文艺座谈会到人类社会的未来
★发现号航天飞机——自然算法伟大的飞矢变换
★星际争霸1的AI设计思路:以人族开局为例
★诸神之战在星际争霸1的实现[001]AI游戏的发端


More info, two other download points(written in Chinese):
(1)speedyshare.com/DQz9y/AiforSC.rar
(2)filerio.in/kw4cl2l2y3qi
级别: 列兵
[未点亮棋中红钻]发帖数量<10篇 [未点亮棋中黄钻]金币数量<100枚 [未点亮棋中蓝钻]乐币数量<10枚 [未点亮棋中粉钻]贡献值数量<1点 [未点亮棋中彩钻]精华帖数量<1篇
发帖
3
金币
38
威望
0
贡献值
0
乐币
0
主题
0
只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2013-04-07

人工智能设计必读


[1 paradox]Why 0.999... is not equal to 1?


Written in 2012


The current mathematic theory tells us, 1>0.9, 1>0.99, 1>0.999, ..., but at last it says 1=0.999..., a negation of itself (Proof 0.999... =1: 1/9=0.111..., 1/9x9=1, 0.111...x9=0.999..., so 1=0.999...). So it is totally a paradox, name it as 【1 paradox】. You see this is a mathematic problem at first, actually it is a philosophic problem. Then we can resolve it. Because math is a incomplete theory, only philosophy could be a complete one. The answer is that 0.999... is not equal to 1. Because of these reasons:


1. The infinite world and finite world.


We live in one world but made up of two parts: the infinite part and the finite part. But we develop our mathematic system based on the finite part, because we never entered into the infinite part. Your attention, God is in it.


0.999... is a number in the infinite world, but 1 is a number in the finite world. For example, 1 represents an apple. But then 0.999...? We don't know. That is to say, we can't use a number in the infinite world to plus a number in the finite world. For example, an apple plus an apple, we say it is 1+1=2, we get two apples, but if it is an apple plus a banana, we only can say we get two fruits. The key problem is we don't know what is 0.999..., we can get nothing. So we can't  say 9+0.999...=9.999... or 10, etc.


We can use "infinite world" and "finite world" to resolve some of zeno's paradox, too.


2. lim0.999...=1, not 0.999...=1.


3.The indeterminate principle.


Because of the indeterminate principle, 1/9 is not equal to 0.111....


For example, cut an apple into nine equal parts, then every part of it is 1/9. But if you use different measure tools to measure the volume of every part, it is indeterminate. That is to say, you may find the volume could not exactly be 0.111..., but it would be 0.123, 0.1142, or 0.11425, etc.


Now we end a biggest mathematical crisis. But most important is this standpoint tells us, our world is only a sample from a sample space. When you realized this, and that the current probability theory is wrong, when you find the Meta-sample-space, you would be able to create a real AI-system. It will indicate that there must be one God-system in the system, which is the controller. Look our world, there must be one God, as for us, only some robots. Maybe we are in a God's game, WHO KNOWS?


相关阅读
★概率论:完全可能性的理论与现实图景
★悖论问题的统一解
★从延安文艺座谈会到人类社会的未来
★发现号航天飞机——自然算法伟大的飞矢变换
★星际争霸1的AI设计思路:以人族开局为例
★诸神之战在星际争霸1的实现[001]AI游戏的发端


More info, two other download points(written in Chinese):
(1)speedyshare.com/DQz9y/AiforSC.rar
(2)filerio.in/kw4cl2l2y3qi
级别: 四级士官
[棋中红钻1级]发帖数量≥10篇 [棋中黄钻1级]金币数量≥100枚 [未点亮棋中蓝钻]乐币数量<10枚 [棋中粉钻1级]贡献值数量≥1点 [未点亮棋中彩钻]精华帖数量<1篇
发帖
74
金币
378
威望
0
贡献值
1
乐币
3
主题
12
只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2013-04-30
完全可能性的理论与现实图景,不远的将来,可能成现实
快速回复

限56 字节
请不要在回贴只采用字母:“ PP、asdfhjkl、HAO、OK、ddddddd ......”。  请不要在回贴过于简单的内容:“不错、顶、支持、厉害、呵呵、靠、晕........”
 
验证问题: 本站网址是?不带http://
上一个 下一个